Monday, March 10, 2008

Gary Hart brings the heat (to Clinton)

I'll let him speak for himself (well, I'll bold some too how about that):

Breaking the Final Rule
By Gary Hart
The Huffington Post

Friday 07 March 2008

It will come as a surprise to many people that there are rules in politics. Most of those rules are unwritten and are based on common understandings, acceptable practices, and the best interest of the political party a candidate seeks to lead. One of those rules is this: Do not provide ammunition to the opposition party that can be used to destroy your party's nominee. This is a hyper-truth where the presidential contest is concerned.

By saying that only she and John McCain are qualified to lead the country, particularly in times of crisis, Hillary Clinton has broken that rule, severely damaged the Democratic candidate who may well be the party's nominee, and, perhaps most ominously, revealed the unlimited lengths to which she will go to achieve power. She has essentially said that the Democratic party deserves to lose unless it nominates her.

As a veteran of red telephone ads and "where's the beef" cleverness, I am keenly aware that sharp elbows get thrown by those trailing in the fourth quarter (and sometimes even earlier). "Politics ain't beanbag," is the old slogan. But that does not mean that it must also be rule-or-ruin, me-first-and-only-me, my way or the highway. That is not politics. That is raw, unrestrained ambition for power that cannot accept the will of the voters.

Senator Obama is right to say the issue is judgment not years in Washington. If Mrs. Clinton loses the nomination, her failure will be traced to the date she voted to empower George W. Bush to invade Iraq. That is not the kind of judgment, or wisdom, required by the leader answering the phone in the night. For her now to claim that Senator Obama is not qualified to answer the crisis phone is the height of irony if not chutzpah, and calls into question whether her primary loyalty is to the Democratic party and the nation or to her own ambition.


[Thanks Msherm for the title and the article]

Enjoy politicians coming out of the woodwork to protect their party's integrity,

Bp

7 comments:

Catherine Just said...

well said

Bentley said...

I'm still really not sure wtf she is doing, well, she is shooting to be VP.. but fuck, she isn't even TRYING anymore.

Bpaul said...

Oh no, she intends to win.

Her crew just "leaked" that they were considering asking Obama to be VP. Which is funny (and Obama says so) considering he's winning at the moment.

What a weirdo.

I'd love a woman for president, just not this one.

Anonymous said...

not so sure about the "integrity" of the democratic party, but "raw, unrestrained ambition for power"?

nice description of the scorpio that Hillary is, lol. . .

(just imagine how PISSED she is after standing by her cheatin' man all these years, to have the presidency yanked outta her claws. . .)

Bpaul said...

Oh the "integrity" statement was from his point of view.

The demublicrats are both goners integritywise as far as I'm concerned.

Just saying, I'm betting he had some party loyalty and just couldn't sit there and let that move by Hillary go unchecked.

Stu Farnham said...

"...calls into question whether her primary loyalty is to the Democratic party and the nation or to her own ambition."

Is there any question with Ms. Clinton?

Anonymous said...

"Ms. Clinton" has about as much "integrity" as the boys she's been hanging with all of her professional career.
Just ask her good pal Mr. Spitzer.